Hankook
Ventus V12 Evo - Comparison Tests
Second place: The unusual suspects.
“Deceptively quick” is
a good summation of the Hankook Ventus V12 Evos because they often didn’t feel as strong as they actually were, particularly in the dry. Their
fourth-place autocross time wasn’t spectacular, but they did outlap thebenchmark
Michelin PS2s. Geswein said the Hankooks felt “somewhat soft” and
“imprecise,” although they were forgiving, yielding consistent laps with no
surprises. Despite that feeling of softness, the V12 Evos somehow managed a
second-place skidpad run of 0.93 g and were above average in braking. Hankook
just launched a new extreme-performance Ventus R-S3 model, which wasn’t
available in time for this test but likely has sharper dry responses.
In the wet, however, the V12s were as sporty
and connected as they come, with grip second only to the PS2s’ and the best
braking. The Hankooks were extremely consistent, likely because they were so
well-behaved, which made them easy to drive quickly. Subjectively, they felt
the best around the track, even though their time trailed slightly behind the
Dunlops’.
With above-average wet
and dry performances, and tying for quietest on the street loop, the V12 Evo is
an impressive and well-rounded summer tire. And, at $106, it’s a bargain, too.
Continued...
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Photos
In
This Story
·
Benchmark: Michelin Pilot Sport
PS2
·
Seventh: Falken Azenis RT-615
·
Fifth: BFGoodrich g-Force T/A
KDW
·
Fourth: Bridgestone Potenza
RE760 Sport
·
Second: Hankook Ventus
V12 Evo
·
First: Dunlop Direzza Sport Z1
Star Spec
Downloads
·
Skidpad,
Force - Wet and Dry
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Photos